WHITEPAPERS

Looking for a PeerGFS alternative? This PeerGFS vs CloudFS comparison exposes critical architectural differences that impact long-term costs and scalability. It also reveals the TCO impact of PeerGFS replication architecture versus CloudFS's global deduplication model. We quantify the hidden costs that replication imposes, detailing how CloudFS provides potential TCO savings in the millions of dollars.

Find out how:

• Replication-based architectures multiply storage costs across sites, and centralized file-locking potentially limits scalability—creating double-migration risk.
• Common PeerGFS complaints could influence your evaluation including multi-vendor support, possible increased storage cost multiplication, and potential compliance complexity.
• CloudFS delivers up to 80% storage reduction via full-mesh peer-to-peer architecture with linear scaling, and no site limitations—delivering essential technical and business outcomes.