Panzura vs. Nasuni
We're built different. That's why Panzura CloudFS is 98.3% faster, 128% more efficient, and keeps your data secure in ways that Nasuni can't.
You could make your users wait for files to sync, spend more on storage, risk losing more data, and slow down even more as you scale. Or, you could check out CloudFS — the choice is yours 😊
| Panzura | Nasuni | |
| Speed & productivity | CloudFS instantly syncs file changes everywhere. Users can even edit the same file at the same time, without overwriting each other. | Users wait for 1-5 minutes per site for files to eventually sync. 5 sites = 5-25 minutes. 10 sites = 10-50 minutes. |
| Resilience |
Immutable data and recovery to a point that's never more than 60 seconds old, anywhere. Snapshots can be configured and retained as you like. |
Immutable data and recovery to a point up to 5 minutes old, per volume, which means more data loss. Frequent snapshots impact file operations, so you have to choose between risk and performance. |
| Protection | CloudFS scans for ransomware in real time and shuts it off at the least-disruptive user level. | File Data Platform is slower to detect ransomware and shuts off ransomware at the location level, disrupting all connected users. |
| Security | CloudFS is FIPS 140-3 certified — military-grade encryption of data at rest and in flight. | File Data Platform has cloud dependencies, so does not hold this stringent level of certification. |
| Optimization | Moves the smallest possible amount of data over the shortest possible distance. Immediate peer-to-peer data exchange for all locations. | File Data Platform moves larger amounts of data from the edge into the cloud. Locations can only exchange data via the cloud store, which means delays. |
Download our comprehensive free comparison to learn in detail how these two solutions operate, why the differences matter, and how they affect what you can expect in your file environment.